There are no footnotes, no endnotes, nor even a bibliography. What's more, the language he uses often descends into jingoistic stereotypes. Structurally, he attempts to divide the book into three sections: the first giving a history of conspiracism, the second introducing us to the Truthers themselves, and the third examining the factors in society that enable such conspiracy theories to grow as well as offering solutions to restrict this growth. In reality, he doesn't stick to this format. He jumps from idea to idea and back through out the book, making for a confusing read.
Now, let's talk about the contents of the book. David Kay is a Canadian conservative. I have nothing wrong with this. My problem is with the fact that he never comes out and states that he is a conservative. The book jacket describes him as an editor and columnist for Canada's National Post newspaper. I wasn't familiar with this paper, and I am comfortable stating that the majority of American's probably aren't either. I had to look up the National Post to learn that it's a newspaper known, indeed founded, for its conservative editorial perspective.
Kay's conservative views permeate the entire book. This isn't a shock; I don't expect anyone to be able to completely divorce themselves from their political opinions or viewpoint. I do, however, expect that when I am reading a nonfiction book or a piece of reporting, that the author will at least make an attempt at objectivity.
Kay fails to do so. When he speaks of far-right conspiracists he is careful to call them "radical," "fringe," or at the very least "far right". When he talks about conspiracists on the opposite end of the spectrum, however, he describes them as "liberals", "left wing college activists the type who had constructed their image of America from books by Noam Chomsky or Howard Zinn," or the "university-educated, anti-American, left-wing side of the political spectrum. He, of course, knows better much like the Truther and other conspiracists he profiles ; there is inarguable, concrete truth, and it is Jonathan Kay's truth.
Big government is evil and everyone knows it, whether they will admit it or not.
Campuses have been overrun by "radical feminists" and the proponents of "radical identity politics" who insist on studying made up subjects like African-American or women's history. Anyone who questions Israel's actions towards Palestinians is an anti-Semite, hiding their hatred of Jews beneath the excuse of civil rights. This is like if I, as a liberal, were to right a book about conspiracy theories and label anyone who believe in laissez-faire capitalism or who opposes affirmative action as conspiracists.
Kay comes dangerously close to embracing the kind of painting-with-a-broad-brush, blaming the world's ills on a singular group, thinking that he so despises in the conspiracists themselves. It's too bad, because Kay does have some kernels of interesting ideas regarding the psychology of those susceptible to conspiracy theories and how such ideas spread.
His own biases and ranting against liberals make these valuable insights hard to take seriously though. But then again, I'm probably just saying all of this because I am part of the problem, helplessly deluded with my "Marxist" political views and dangerous "anti-racist" thinking. It's all because I've read that nonsense by Chomsky and Zinn, you know.
Luckily for you, I have read a few other, better books about conspiracy theories and can recommend them to you. If you're looking for one tracing the history of conspiracy theories and their influence on politics, I recommend Voodoo Histories by David Aaronovitch. If you want interesting profiles of the people who hold these beliefs, read Jon Ronson's Them, which even features some of the same people interviewed by Kay, but in much more depth. A bit of a disappointment.
Got off to a promising start, discussing the ideas and motivations behind conspiracy theory, and how to identify conspiracy theories, with group psychology, etc. However, the subjects veer into things that the author dislikes, ranging from academia to civil rights, and atheism! Personal attacks, sparse citations, and logical fallacies which conspiracy theorists themselves might use.
It's a shame. The author does have a plan to fight conspiracy theories, and that is Again, this is not a bad start, but what else is to be done? It is oddly fortunate to live in a country which is so permissive in free speech, that such completely false and possibly harmful statements are allowed. Here at Walmart. Your email address will never be sold or distributed to a third party for any reason. Due to the high volume of feedback, we are unable to respond to individual comments.
- Join Kobo & start eReading today.
- BusinessNews Publishing - Read his/her books online!
- Among the Truthers : A Journey Through America's Growing Conspiracist Underground?
- Cantata No. 169 -- Gott soll allein mein Herze haben (God Alone Shall Have My Heart): For Alto Solo, SATB Chorus/Choir and Orchestra with German and English Text (Choral Score): 0 (Kalmus Edition).
- Ten Miles to Ruin.
- Among the Truthers - Wikipedia.
- Die Kuba-Krise 1962 (German Edition).
Sorry, but we can't respond to individual comments. Recent searches Clear All. Update Location. Shop now. Report incorrect product info or prohibited items. Jonathan Kay. Book Format: Choose an option. Add to List.
Add to Registry. About This Item We aim to show you accurate product information. Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not verified it. See our disclaimer. America is awash with conspiracy theories, and the shared view of reality we once took for granted has been permanently shattered. Among the Truthers. Specifications Series Title Hollows. Customer Reviews. Average rating: 2. See all reviews. So far, all attempts to respectfully engage Mr.
Wood with careful, well-supported arguments by Ted Kirkpatrick, Scott Mandia, and Tenney Naumer have been met with willfully ignorant talking points and repetitious untruths, such as one would expect from an uninformed reader of Anthony Watts and Steve McI. The same goes for his three-part bloviation, Sustainability, Tyranny or Theft?
He shows little evidence of being someone who can be reasoned with. The National Association of Scholars should be deeply embarrassed to be represented by someone who is so obviously ideologically biased and ignorant of his chosen editorial subject as Mr.
Open Thread # 10 | Deep Climate
Wood a letter of protest requesting his apology for his libelous attacks on their integrity, and demand his resignation if he refuses. A full apology or resignation of Mr. I imagine Kerry Emanuel would be none too pleased, judging from his essay on Climategate. Climategate is merely the latest in a series of coordinated, politically motivated attacks that represent an aggravated assault on scholarship that should be of concern to every member of NAS who, if they are like me, joined this organization because we were tired of seeing scholarship enslaved to ideology, particularly in academia.
NAS has been at the forefront of the battle against such assaults on reason as campus speech codes, affirmative action, deconstruction, and other horrors perpetrated mostly from the political Left.
The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis
I would ay a good rule about industrial funding is: yes in some cases it can be terrifically productive , but always be careful. More serial plagiarism of plagiarists, but with consequences in this instance: Stolen Code Is Linked to Program for Chess. Hyatt said he was concerned about how common plagiarizing was becoming. And he noted that Mr. Rajlich himself had been plagiarized. Hyatt wrote in an e-mail. In this case, Dr. Nevertheless, he ran afoul of the rules of the Computer Gaming Association. Opportunity at the Chronicle! We have an opportunity to enlighten their readers on sundry matters including but not limited to laxity at GMU.
It is easy if one focuses on all Chronicle readers except PW as I will today. I made one small comment there last night directed to PW. I was drawn by the registration system into using a user name instead of my proper name. Should I change that for future comments if any? But note, I will not focus on GMU. Others here can do that much better and I hope someone will.